Skip to main content

Practical Ideas on Teacher Ed Reform

A few weeks after the election Gov. Scott Walker spoke about changing the way we fund pubic K-12 and higher education. It's the usual tough talk about "outcomes" with on comment in particular that has turned some heads.
Part of me could go on and on about where this could lead - plus there are no specifics behind this statement, but I just want to focus my mental capital on things I know about - Schools of Education. 

What we don't need anymore of are graduates who don't have a robust background in educating all learners. I recently ran into a former student who is now 21. He proudly told me he was getting an education degree to teach social studies. My response was "That's great! What do you think about getting your special ed certification too?" He told me he was thinking about that and I encouraged him to seriously consider it. The perspectives and experiences it would give in working with diverse learners would carry over into any job in education. I wish I had done my undergraduate work in that field. I would have been a more mature educator at a younger age because of it.

With differentiation, personalization, self-paced competency-based education being some of the current trends (I don't think sit in your rows, shut up and do the odds is ever coming back...) we need every single SoE graduate to know how to work with different types of learners from day one. State-level leadership (DPI especially) can't just keep making comments on what we should be doing in public ed and not work to ensure future generations of teachers have that skill set right away. A Vision for Digital Learning in WI that focuses on personalizing education and meeting the needs of all students is great, but we need some action.

The basic building blocks of an undergraduate experience need to morph and rotate around meeting all student's needs - not just one 3-credit class on it. What I'm going to look into next is what DPI requires from SoE and what we'll need to target to take out of undergraduate requirements - because with student teaching, is already a 5-year degree.

It's easy to complain about what politicos pontificate about. I think it's more practical to offer ideas that will work that fit in the box they're trying to create for their own uses. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do we have to call them 21st Century Skills?

I'm glad a few years ago I introduced the book 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times  to our administration. It was exciting to have an assistant superintendent interested in changing the conversation for learning in our school district. While I still certainly appreciate the content of this book, I am soooooooo sick of hearing about 21st Century Learning, 21st Century Skills, 21st Century ad nauseam . Isn't there a better way to phrase this for everyday conversation? Perhaps we need to stick with this so everyone hears consistent jargon, but I don't think people overall have the right idea of what it means. I would imagine if we polled our staff or parents they would say its technology or computer skills. That couldn't be further from the truth. If I say higher order thinking skills  I think that's pretty clear (at least to me) of what that means. I worry 21st Century  means the Jetsons or Star Trek to all too many people. I appreciate Tony Wag...

I killed my iPhone

Dropped my iPhone in the water yesterday. Yup, needed to check my email so badly that I had to take it out over water. I watched the life flicker out of it, then Googled what to do - so now it sits in a sealed bowl with rice. I have little hope. What was so important? Nothing...just the feeling that I can check it, so I should. Being that this information obsession is going to cost me, its time to take a breath and re-evaluate my usage.