Skip to main content

Access - A Tale of Two Vacations

Right now I'm writing this from Edwards, CO which is about 20 minutes from Vail, CO. Breathtaking views, great vacation spot - we've had a wonderful first day decompressing after a flight to Denver and a 2.5 hour drive. Here in the middle of the Rockies 3G and cellular service is no problem.

About three weeks ago my wife traveled to Cuba with her colleagues for a week long trip. After I dropper her off at the airport I packed up our two young boys and headed for refuge on the shores of Lake Michigan at my parent's house. They live in a place called Kewaunee, WI. Kewaunee is about 30 miles west of Green Bay. I had random cellular access - meaning forget data, I was only able to answer or take a call at my parent's house maybe 5-10% of the time I was there for a six-day stretch. My parents Internet connection was okay for being non-fiber, bit was pretty pricy - $60 a month.

In Wisconsin terms Kewaunee, isn't the middle of nowhere. Access to information is difficult I think because there aren't many people there or regional centers to drive access there. Not having a ton of money there doesn't help, but even in the vacation haven of Door County, about 30 miles north (WI's "thumb" on map) access is also spotty.

Now here in what I'll call the Greater Vail Area it's condos, resorts and vacation homes galore. And I've had zero issues with access.

I'm not writing this to rail against money, because if I'm sitting here, clearly I'm not doing too bad. Nor is this message original. If you Google "Lawrence Lessig broadband" you'd get a much more concise, well-researched message. After these experiences this summer I see more clearly that there needs to be a wide-scale push to increase access in all parts of the country. It's been a political talking point, but no action from what I can tell.

I grew up in Kewaunee, and millions of kids around the country grow up in places like that which area even further away from regional hubs and interstates. Some of them even live in the middle of cities, but don't have access because of socioeconomic status (thank goodness for Connect 2 Compete, a program we need to do a better job of getting the word out on). They all deserve some level of access. No community should be left behind. I worry about how long this will take to get to a critical mass in this country where it gets addressed.

I don't really have any answers, but I think the answers live in cooperative groups like Wiscnet. Some might think cooperatives wreak of Cuban-style communism, but isn't working together to solve problems a universal good?

Tonight we talked to a couple from Colorado Springs who were evacuated from their home a few weeks ago. They said officials who came to help from outside their region commented they had never seen community come together like that. Can't we work together on more than just surreal natural catastrophes? Can't we come together for an educational catastrophe? At least that's what I see it as.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do we have to call them 21st Century Skills?

I'm glad a few years ago I introduced the book 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times  to our administration. It was exciting to have an assistant superintendent interested in changing the conversation for learning in our school district. While I still certainly appreciate the content of this book, I am soooooooo sick of hearing about 21st Century Learning, 21st Century Skills, 21st Century ad nauseam . Isn't there a better way to phrase this for everyday conversation? Perhaps we need to stick with this so everyone hears consistent jargon, but I don't think people overall have the right idea of what it means. I would imagine if we polled our staff or parents they would say its technology or computer skills. That couldn't be further from the truth. If I say higher order thinking skills  I think that's pretty clear (at least to me) of what that means. I worry 21st Century  means the Jetsons or Star Trek to all too many people. I appreciate Tony Wag...

...moving in.

...getting used to my new digs in Germantown . I moved into an office I'll be sh aring with a soon to be hired Student Information Specialist. To be honest there were plenty of times in the last week I felt like I was going to puke - moving on from all I've known for 7 years professionally. Stomachs have settled now and great conversations are taking their place. Had a great one today with our high school media specialist Jeff Schreiber  who has done great things integrating technology, boosting circulation and getting kids reading. I know we're going to do some great things in the next few years and I look forward to the challenge of discovering what works for Germantown in terms of instructional technology. In addition to instructional technology integration, I'm also working on data and assessment analysis. This is a hot topic in Wisconsin right now, as the DPI NAEPized  (more than you care to know on this link) our standardized test scores. Students who may...

The Future of Technology Funding and Support

Will Richardson and Chris Lehman shined a light  on what I found to be horrifying statements. At the Education Innovation Summit Lehman reported defeated former Mayor of Washington DC Adrian Fenty said "if we fire more teachers, we'll have more money for technology."This happened a while ago - back in April, but this morning it came back to me as I contemplated the future of technology funding and support in schools in the face of ever-decreasing budgets. In my opinion, people are more important than machines for our kids. I can buy an iPad or laptop, but a personal teacher/mentor/advisor that's a little more pricey. Can we find ways to use technology to lighten the load for teachers - of course - but as a parent, a school flush with laptops and tablets, but devoid the necessary number of caring professionals to support learning is not a school I want my kids in. To contradict Mr. Fenty, "the more technology we don't buy, the more caring professionals we ...