Skip to main content

Do we have to call them 21st Century Skills?

I'm glad a few years ago I introduced the book 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times to our administration. It was exciting to have an assistant superintendent interested in changing the conversation for learning in our school district. While I still certainly appreciate the content of this book, I am soooooooo sick of hearing about 21st Century Learning, 21st Century Skills, 21st Century ad nauseam. Isn't there a better way to phrase this for everyday conversation? Perhaps we need to stick with this so everyone hears consistent jargon, but I don't think people overall have the right idea of what it means. I would imagine if we polled our staff or parents they would say its technology or computer skills. That couldn't be further from the truth. If I say higher order thinking skills I think that's pretty clear (at least to me) of what that means. I worry 21st Century means the Jetsons or Star Trek to all too many people.

I appreciate Tony Wagner's "Survival Skills" because that's what they are for the modern economy - how to compete with your peers around the world. When the founders of High Tech High started planning in 1998, did they say "we're going to focus on 21st Century Skills?" I wasn't there, but I doubt it. If you go to the page on their history, the only time 21 comes up is at the bottom of the screen for the last time the page was updated.

Is there a better way to frame the conversation? Or should we just stick with what we have?

Comments

  1. I agree that "21st century skills" is no longer the best descriptor. Our school board actually refers to these generally as "learning skills" and C21L (Council on 21st Century Learning)has the tagline "Envision next generation learning" - which is still pretty vague. I think higher order thinking skills only addresses some of the skills - I am not sure about collaboration and communication being covered by that phrase. Survival skills seems like it could be about something else entirely - though I know what he means.

    Just brainstorming now:
    -Skills for success
    -Solution-making skills
    -Active learning skills
    -habits of mind
    -life skills

    Can't wait to see what others come up with!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Nancy - Thanks for the post! I agree higher order thinking skills doesn't cover all the bases - but it is a good start. I'm looking at HOTS as simply terminology that makes sense to the average person - again, at least it makes sense to me. That's a good tagline that frames the conversation well. Allows the person to wonder...

    I really like the way "habits of mind" sounds, but it would still confuse.

    Others...
    Modern competition skills?
    Modern life skills?
    Contemporary competition/life skills?
    Problems solving skills? That could cover many fields - farmers, auto mechanics, bankers, teachers all solve problems everyday.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Future of Technology Funding and Support

Will Richardson and Chris Lehman shined a light  on what I found to be horrifying statements. At the Education Innovation Summit Lehman reported defeated former Mayor of Washington DC Adrian Fenty said "if we fire more teachers, we'll have more money for technology."This happened a while ago - back in April, but this morning it came back to me as I contemplated the future of technology funding and support in schools in the face of ever-decreasing budgets. In my opinion, people are more important than machines for our kids. I can buy an iPad or laptop, but a personal teacher/mentor/advisor that's a little more pricey. Can we find ways to use technology to lighten the load for teachers - of course - but as a parent, a school flush with laptops and tablets, but devoid the necessary number of caring professionals to support learning is not a school I want my kids in. To contradict Mr. Fenty, "the more technology we don't buy, the more caring professionals we

...moving in.

...getting used to my new digs in Germantown . I moved into an office I'll be sh aring with a soon to be hired Student Information Specialist. To be honest there were plenty of times in the last week I felt like I was going to puke - moving on from all I've known for 7 years professionally. Stomachs have settled now and great conversations are taking their place. Had a great one today with our high school media specialist Jeff Schreiber  who has done great things integrating technology, boosting circulation and getting kids reading. I know we're going to do some great things in the next few years and I look forward to the challenge of discovering what works for Germantown in terms of instructional technology. In addition to instructional technology integration, I'm also working on data and assessment analysis. This is a hot topic in Wisconsin right now, as the DPI NAEPized  (more than you care to know on this link) our standardized test scores. Students who may ha

Practical Ideas on Teacher Ed Reform

A few weeks after the election Gov. Scott Walker spoke about changing the way we fund pubic K-12 and higher education. It's the usual tough talk about "outcomes" with on comment in particular that has turned some heads. "In higher education, that means not only degrees, but are young people getting degrees in jobs that are open and needed today -- not just the jobs that the universities want to give us, or degrees that people want to give us." Part of me could go on and on about where this could lead - plus  there are no specifics behind this statement, but I just want to focus my mental capital on things I know about - Schools of Education.  What we don't need anymore of are graduates who don't have a robust background in educating all learners. I recently ran into a former student who is now 21. He proudly told me he was getting an education degree to teach social studies. My response was "That's great! What do you think about gett