Skip to main content

Balance In Professional Development

As I wrote last night, I'm all wound up about releasing of first Flipped PD release on Tuesday. Tonight I was reading the Chief Learning Officer magazine and many of the articles focus on informal learning. The latest article I read - Unlock the Next Wave of Productivity - really drives home the importance of new shifts in what training should look like.
Only by enabling informal learning will organizations meet demands for greater flexibility and more learner-driven content.
While that article said what I wanted to hear (yes, you're on the right track), it also reminded me of meeting the needs of all learners. Our professionals come from different generations, have different learning styles and come with different levels of technology skills. How do we move forward and still respect the more traditional thinking folks? Hiring substitutes for teachers to go to training is an expensive non-scaleable solution, but you take advantage of it when you have it as an option. Inservice time in another popular avenue, per the survey I posted last night, but with assessments, new curriculum, interventions...a lot of development time is spoken for before the first student registers in August. Again, you take advantage of the time you have, like the middle school scheduled me for a January afternoon two weeks ago. I really want to do a summer Ed Camp or some sort of learning institute - hoping we can get approval for that this spring. Personally I need to work on being a more engaging speaker. I know my stuff, I'm patient, but I need to make sure my delivery isn't just loud (as I'm told it can be from time to time.

When else? This afternoon I spoke with Derrel Fincher about the importance of meeting teachers where they are and growing them for there. How do I meet them and get them to move along if their traditional expectations for professional development melt away? How can I best balance out all our learning offerings?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Google Reader's End - Maybe its a Good Thing?

Like other folks, I was surprised and annoyed about the end of life announcement on Google Reader. This is something I use everyday (but I guess I'm only one of a few thousand...not several million) and I rely on it for getting a great deal of good ideas sent directly to me. Tonight I had a thought that it might be a good thing. Did Google Reader stunt my own growth and curiosity to read about what many others have to say? There's tens of thousands (if not hundreds of thousands or more...) of educators out there sharing what they're doing, what they're thinking about but don't have the bully pulpit of Larry Cuban or Will Richardson. It certainly doesn't mean they have lesser things to say. Mostly they right about their own action research they're doing right now - very useful things to read for practitioners. In the last few weeks I've divorced myself from Reader and used other avenues to get my information from. Tonight I came upon this nice post on I

...moving in.

...getting used to my new digs in Germantown . I moved into an office I'll be sh aring with a soon to be hired Student Information Specialist. To be honest there were plenty of times in the last week I felt like I was going to puke - moving on from all I've known for 7 years professionally. Stomachs have settled now and great conversations are taking their place. Had a great one today with our high school media specialist Jeff Schreiber  who has done great things integrating technology, boosting circulation and getting kids reading. I know we're going to do some great things in the next few years and I look forward to the challenge of discovering what works for Germantown in terms of instructional technology. In addition to instructional technology integration, I'm also working on data and assessment analysis. This is a hot topic in Wisconsin right now, as the DPI NAEPized  (more than you care to know on this link) our standardized test scores. Students who may ha

Practical Ideas on Teacher Ed Reform

A few weeks after the election Gov. Scott Walker spoke about changing the way we fund pubic K-12 and higher education. It's the usual tough talk about "outcomes" with on comment in particular that has turned some heads. "In higher education, that means not only degrees, but are young people getting degrees in jobs that are open and needed today -- not just the jobs that the universities want to give us, or degrees that people want to give us." Part of me could go on and on about where this could lead - plus  there are no specifics behind this statement, but I just want to focus my mental capital on things I know about - Schools of Education.  What we don't need anymore of are graduates who don't have a robust background in educating all learners. I recently ran into a former student who is now 21. He proudly told me he was getting an education degree to teach social studies. My response was "That's great! What do you think about gett